Financial Planning Tip of the Month
Sequence of Returns
Thank You Black Rock for the slides below >>>
This is one of our favorite topics to teach and incredibly important to understand. We will be brief but promise to get into this further either in our next meeting or in future newsletters. When it comes to financial planning, it is an ever changing and ongoing battle of what we can and cannot control. The most obvious thing we cannot control is the performance of a portfolio invested in the stock market. Some may claim that they can predict the direction of the market but we all know the saying...it is impossible to time the market.
OK, so here is what you need to know for today.
The closer you are to retirement, the more important this is. Ready?...
Average returns DO NOT MATTER. Actual returns DO MATTER.
Please make note that in the first slide below Mrs. Jones, Mr. Smith and Mr. Brown all had the same 7% average return over their 25 years of investing for retirement. No money was added or subtracted and they all started and ended up with the same nest egg at the end.
But didn't I say average returns do not matter? Yes, I did.
Please move on to the second slide. Please note that Mrs. Jones, Mr. Smith and Mr. Brown all had $1,000,000 when they retired at 65. Not too shabby, right? All 3 again had an average return of 7% during their 25 years in retirement. Sounds good doesn't it? Next, (and this one is very important) they all withdrew $60,000 per year adjusted each year for modest inflation. So, lets recap...they averaged 7% per year and took out 6% per year so they must be good to go. Right? Wrong! This is where SEQUENCE OF RETURNS is so incredibly important to be aware of. Poor Mr. Smith (no pun intended) retired and had 2 negative years of performance right off the bat. Most would say...it's only 2 years out of 25 so he should be OK. Take a look at the bottom of the chart. Those 2 negative years right at the beginning of retirement wiped out Mr. Smith's savings while Mrs. Jones passes her $1,000,000 to her heirs. Again, the only difference was the SEQUENCE OF RETURNS (to be specific Mrs. Jones and Mr. Smith had the exact opposite chronology of returns and Mr. Brown had 7% each and every year.
This is a major focus in our practice. We are committed to helping our clients gain more control and do whatever they can to avoid the ugly outcome that can come from simply bad retirement timing. Stay tuned for more sometime soon.