Blog #31

 

OTT-Technology in Sports

(Part II)

Limitations, Risk of Independency & Conclusion

As the battle "OLD vs. NEW Media" in the global sports rights market looms, the underlying technology to deliver the live streaming experience at scale and in real-time still faces many limitations: latency, buffering, and lackluster video quality among others. 🧐

 

Especially in large-scale markets where the most popular leagues regularly draw +/- 20 million concurrent viewers (think: USA 🇺🇸), those technological limitations make exclusive media rights for a digital-only contender in the medium-term future more than unlikely. Instead, they will rather serve as a complementary channel to linear TV for premium live content: 🏀🏈. The implications include less exclusivity, more fragmentation and the continuation of legacy media companies remaining the most important media partners of the NBA, NFL & Co. beyond their current rights period. 😉

 

Over in Europe 🇪🇺, however, new market entrants (think: DAZN, Amazon, Eleven Sports) got a much earlier shot at the most sought-after live sports content due to several factors including stronger regulation by public bodies resulting in shorter rights cycles and smaller viewerships lowering the stress on OTT platforms given territory-based media markets. 

📺➡️💻

 

Despite OTT delivery being the future of sports broadcasts, the market for B2B service providers and their white-label solutions (think: Sportradar AG, Deltatre) is probably limited: With rights-buying entities being aware of the new technology's importance, acquiring/developing in-house expertise in this area will be made a priority. This leaves only less monetizable niche sports as potential clients for independent service providers. Such partnerships (think: Sportradar - powered ehfTV🤾‍♂️, Perform-powered WTA TV 🎾& FIBA TV 🏀) & Deltatre - powered FINAtv 🏊🏼‍♂️) rarely entail service fees for the OTT infrastructure paid by rights holders but less attractive revenue sharing only.

 

Solution: Getting into the business of acquiring, trading, or distributing rights and directly competing with their clients? 🤔 At least DAZN agreed. ☝🏼

 

Finally, I look at two recent news that could provide a first glimpse into the medium-term future (3-5 years) of sports broadcasting: Integration of social, gaming & betting with focus on niche sports and the inevitable aggregation-model for the increasingly fragmented landscape of sports video content. 👀

This is the second part of "OTT - Technology in Sports." The first part covered the origins of OTT with MLB's ⚾️ BAMTech Media in 2002, how legacy media companies continue to catch up to digital-only players by acquisitions (think: ESPN/BAMTech) or in-house development (think: NBC/Playmaker), and why some those sports media service providers decided to remain independent and others decided to cash out by being scooped up by the aforementioned legacy media companies. 

 

Finally, I would appreciate a follow on Twitter (@yannickramcke), where I share my thoughts regarding current developments in everything "Sports Business, Media & More" on a daily basis.

Continue Reading

Share on social

Share on FacebookShare on X (Twitter)

Check out my website  
This email was created with Wix.‌ Discover More