Upstream Watch

Newsletter

Hello Everyone!

While we do our best to keep our updates brief, we have decided it is necessary to detail the status of all of Upstream’s legal cases. Below is a summary of each case. Please feel free to contact us if you would like more details or have any questions.

 

As always, we could not accomplish any of this without everyone’s incredible ongoing support. We cannot thank you enough. If you can help us again, please do! And please spread the word of our work to your friends and family!

 

In the meantime, our lawyers continue to do an excellent job of making sure we have the best legal representation possible. It’s been a long struggle, but we’re winning, the Bay’s winning, the wildlife is winning, the local fishing communities are winning, and a collective commitment for restored and protected marine and freshwater ecosystems is winning!

 

Distilling this 5-year legal fight into a few words is almost impossible – it is an extremely complicated situation! Our attorneys are in agreement that this is in the top-three most complex cases in which they’ve been involved. It’s a Herculean effort that requires teamwork from all sides. Upstream Watch and The Friends of Harriet Hartley (FHH) have tackled different aspects, and the lawyers have teamed up on many of the cases. Upstream has paid for all the legal expertise from the attorneys from the firm Curtis Thaxter and for the invaluable legal work from Attorney David Losee, and together we are winning!

 

Our attorneys have been extremely generous with their time and are wholly invested. That being said, Upstream’s legal expenses average $20,000+/month! And yet, this fight has become about so much more than Nordic. The number-one lesson Upstream has learned is that the DEP is underfunded, understaffed, and is not given the power and autonomy needed to enforce the law. We also know that there will be more Nordics, and that there are many serious environmental threats to the Penobscot Watershed that need to be addressed. One of the many things we have understood throughout this process is that there remains an urgent need to develop and maintain a permanent and strong presence on the Bay, ensuring it is protected and that existing laws are enforced. Stay tuned to learn more about our plans to make sure this happens!

 

Below is a summary of the many legal cases and where we currently stand.

Intertidal Land Ownership Case: WON

On February 16, 2023, the Maine Law Court ruled in our favor on the intertidal land ownership case. The Law Court’s decision tracks Upstream’s attorney David Perkins’ winning brief point by point. This case was an appeal of the lower court’s ruling on the matter.

 

Background:

•  In 2018, Upstream Watch hires the most knowledgeable surveyor on the subject of Maine intertidal land, Don Richards, who determines that the actual owners of that land are Judith Grace and Jeffrey Mabee.

•     Attorney Kim Tucker proposes the excellent idea of placing a conservation easement on the land.

• Upstream creates a conservation easement over the intertidal land, and Judith and Jeffrey are gracious and eager to sign.

• Friends of Harriet Hartley forms (FHH), and Attorney Kim Tucker is hired to represent Judith Grace and Jeffrey Mabee and FHH.

• Upstream transfers the conservation easement to FHH.

• FHH files the original suit asking the courts to decide ownership, among numerous other issues. Upstream Watch is named as an interested party.

• Nordic sues Upstream Watch, FHH and Grace/Mabee for tortious interference on the eve of the BEP hearings, pulling Upstream Watch directly into the fight.

• Companies like Nordic misuse the court process to intimidate and silence their critics. To have the tortious interference claims dismissed, and to protect our non-profit from a potentially very expensive adverse verdict, it was critical to prove the Eckrote’s never owned the intertidal lands.

• Upstream files a counterclaim for abuse of process against Nordic, alleging their misuse of the courts to pressure Upstream to cease support for Grace and Mabee’s claim of title to the intertidal lands.

• Again relying on intimidation tactics, Nordic demands Upstream identify our donors in discovery. Nordic then offered to drop the tortious interference claim against Upstream if we agreed to stop all support, including any financial support, for Mabee/Grace and FHH.

• David Perkins, of Curtis Thaxter, takes the lead on the case as it proceeds to trial. (Perkins is considered to be one of the best real estate lawyers in Maine. He has successfully tried multiple cases with our surveyor, Don Richards.)

• Upstream’s attorneys formulate the plan on whom to depose and direct the depositions of Nordic’s surveyor Dorsky, Nordic’s employees Ed Cotter, CFO Brenda Chandler, a “genealogist” hired by Nordic, and CEO Eric Heim. These depositions are critical to building our case.

• The costs of these depositions and the expert testimony of Don Richards at trial are paid for by Upstream.

• The City of Belfast and Nordic make a “closed door” deal to buy the Eckrote’s land and to take the remaining land by eminent domain before the court issues its decision.

• Justice Murray in Waldo County Superior Court decides in favor of the Eckrotes, and Upstream immediately begins working on our appeal to the Maine Supreme Court (called the Maine Law Court).

• David Perkins writes Upstream’s brief for the appeal.

• Victory! Upstream and FHH win on appeal. The Court’s decision tracks Attorney Perkin’s brief nearly word for word and agrees on all points.

• Vindicated by the Law Court’s decision, Upstream moves to dismiss the tortious interference claim before Justice Murray at Waldo County Superior Court.

 

Vacating Nordic's Permits: IN PROGRESS

  • Attorney David Losee on behalf of Upstream Watch states our position to the Maine Law Court that the Court’s February 16, 2023 decision renders the permits awarded to Nordic void ab initio (they never existed) and that an order should be issued to that effect.

  • Upstream is adamant that the permits be revoked and not simply suspended. (Suspended permits mean Nordic no longer has to meet any of the numerous and ongoing permit requirements and conditions that demonstrate the operational impacts of their facility. If Nordic is allowed to suspend their permits, they may start up again at any point, or sell the permits. Upstream is determined to do all it can to see those permits fully vacated. The suspension of the permits only benefits Nordic.)

  • Supreme Court Justice Horton directs all parties to file briefs on whether the permits are now void due to Nordic never having TRI.  Briefs are due by April 7, 2023; reply briefs by April 17, 2023; and no oral argument. The Court will decide on the briefs.

  • Upstream Watch briefs the subject as requested. Nordic and the State choose not to. (This is a tactical decision by the State and Nordic, which allows them to attack our brief in reply but gives us nothing to rebut.)

  • Upstream asks the Law Court to declare the permits void, and Upstream Attorney David Losee files a petition to DEP Commissioner Loyzim demanding that Nordic’s permits be revoked and demands a hearing on the subject. 

Eminent Domain: IN PROGRESS

•  Superior Court Judge Murray calls for an April 28 conference of all lawyers involved to schedule proceedings to resolve the remaining issues, which includes the complaint against the city for the illegal taking by eminent domain filed by Upstream, Grace/Mabee and FHH. One of the other remaining issues is Upstream’s countersuit for abuse of process against Nordic.  Judge Murray instructs the lawyers to meet informally and accomplish as much by agreement as possible. This process yields few results. 

•  The plaintiff’s most recent motion regarding the eminent domain case can be found here.

• Attorney Wesley Horton agrees to represent Upstream in the eminent domain portion of these cases. Upstream is extremely fortunate to have Attorney Horton. He successfully argued the most important eminent domain case ever brought in front of the US Supreme Court! Wes Horton, along with our Maine team, are a truly formidable crew, and are ready to take this case on when it moves forward.

 

BEP Permit Appeal: IN PROGRESS

  • Attorney David Losee writes the brief and makes oral arguments to the Superior Court in Kennebec County (Justice Murphy) in December of 2021. 

  • Upstream’s appeal argues that the permits are in violation of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and Clean Air Act (CAA), and we also argue that Nordic lacks TRI.

  • Justice Murphy rules against all plaintiffs on all counts. 

  • We immediately begin the appeal to the Maine Law Court. This case is fully briefed in 2022. No oral arguments are scheduled due to the uncertainty of the validity of the permits.

  • Should the Maine Supreme Court agree with Upstream that the Nordic permits are void ab initio, this case will be moot and there will be no issue to argue. Otherwise, this case will be argued at the Court’s earliest convenience.

  • FHH also files an appeal of the BEP award of permits to Nordic. The court orders the cases consolidated. (The Upstream case focuses on the CAA/CWA, and two state environmental statutes. The FHH appeal is focused on corruption in the governor’s office and conspiracy in furtherance of that corruption.)

Upstream Watch versus Belfast Planning Board: IN PROGRESS

• Upstream Watch appeals the permits awarded to Nordic by the Belfast Planning Board.

• The appeal goes to the Belfast Zoning Board of Appeals as required by law.

• Belfast Zoning Board of Appeals claims Upstream does not have standing to take the appeal.

• Upstream appeals the issue of standing to the Superior Court and the ZBA’s decision is sustained.

• Upstream appeals this matter to the Maine Supreme Court. Arguments before the Law Court for this case will take place on May 10 in Portland.

• Winning this appeal will put us back in front of the Belfast Planning Board. If the Maine Supreme Court determines that the permits awarded by DEP to Nordic were void ab initio, Upstream will move promptly for a similar result before the Belfast Planning Board.

 

GUARDIANS OF THE BAY

 

Multiple cases and multiple battles still lie ahead. But a unified force of dedicated, passionate and driven citizens has come together to work tirelessly to protect our Bay. We’re incredibly thankful for the work of our top-notch legal team, the work of everyone at FHH, and to all of you who have taken up the cause and shown your support. Upstream Watch’s momentum is building, so please, spread the word! It is only through the support of people like you that we can continue in our mission to protect and preserve our natural waterways, ecosystems and communities.

 

Thank you,

 

 

Amy Grant

President

Upstream Watch

Visit Our Site
Upstream Watch
learn@upstreamwatch.org

Check out our site  
This email was created with Wix.‌ Discover More