The FLUORIDE Report

Fluoride Free Canada

August 15th, 2022

Issue 14

Hello :

 

DEBUNKING THE MYTHS – EPISODE #6

We saw in the last newsletter that fluoridation experts believe that an intake of 0.04 mg fluoride/kg/day would be optimal. A lower fluoride intake would not provide the protective benefit of fluoride against caries, while a higher intake would be likely to cause dental fluorosis. The margin between efficacy and toxicity is therefore narrow. Today, we take on…

MYTH #6: That it is possible to control daily fluoride intake for the entire population regardless of all sources of fluoride exposure.

 

MONITORING THE DAILY FLUORIDE DOSE IS COMPLEX

 

Fluoridation increases fluoride intake from food.

When fluoridation was introduced, experts did not realize that adding fluoride to water would also increase fluoride intake from food or beverages, such as that which goes into home food preparation, for making soup, baking bread, or cooking rice or pasta.

The use of fluoridated water at the industrial food level increases the concentration of fluoride, by 1.5 to 6 times depending upon the foods and the cooking processes.  Not to mention the high volume of prepared beverages we consume, such as diluted juice, coffee and tea.

 

As if the parameters were not already complex enough since the launch of the first fluoridation experiments in 1945, we have multiplied the sources of exposure to fluoride. We consume far more industrially-prepared food and beverages today. As more and more cities have introduced fluoridation, more and more factories are supplied with fluoridated water. Fluoride intake from food and drink has doubled if not tripled since that time.

 

Keeping track of intake from other sources of fluoride is also essential.

 

First, we saw the introduction of fluoride supplements to bring the supposed benefits of fluoridation to communities that have not yet introduced fluoridation.
 

Then from the 1960s, a range of dental hygiene products containing fluoride were introduced. The experts' intention was to combine the systemic effect of fluoride from water or supplements with a topical effect:
 

o   First, we saw the appearance of fluoride toothpastes, then fluoride mouthwashes, then high-concentration mouthwashes available only from dentists.
 

o   Second, specialized products were introduced, either for the public or reserved for professionals: gels, sealants, lacquers, dental floss, toothbrushes, chewing gums, amalgams and fluoride composites.

 

All these products increase fluoride intake and it is impossible not to swallow it or not to absorb a certain dose via the mucous membranes. The doses thus consumed vary from individual-to-individual and from day-to-day.

 

Do parents take the time to watch their children closely every time they brush their teeth to make sure they don't use more than a small pea-size of toothpaste? Do they check that they also properly spit out and that they fully rinse their mouths afterward?

 

WHO IS MONITORING?

In our society, there is no one assigned to monitor the daily fluoride intake for every citizen. An insufficient intake of fluoride would NOT ensure its presumed preventive role against cavities. An excessive intake would be detrimental to health, more particularly at certain periods of life when we are more sensitive to fluoride toxicity: in the fetus, during pregnancy and during the first 10 years of life.

With fluoridation, the administered dose of fluoride through drinking water cannot be controlled. What medicine can claim scientific rigour by randomly administering therapeutic doses of any drug or nutrient? Yet that is what governments are doing with fluoridation.

 

Which doctor, which dentist, which dental hygienist, which public health professional works to ensure that every citizen (baby, child, adolescent, adult and elderly person) maintains their “industry standard”, daily fluoride intake at 0.04 mg per kg of weight?

 

IN SUMMARY

 

The idea that we can control the daily dose of fluoride is illusory when the amount of water consumed is random from one person to another and from one day to another, and when foods and beverages contain much more fluoride today. Furthermore, the sources of fluoride products have increased 50-fold over time. So if the industry feels they can “control” the daily intake by adjusting the parts per million (ppm) added to the water supply…think again!

 

Gilles Parent, N.A.
Member of the Board of Fluoride Free Canada
Co-author of Fluoridation: Autopsy Of A Scientific Error 

FLUORIDE FACT

Any fluoride intake from any source can be toxic, especially to the developing fetus.  Therefore, it is highly recommended to avoid ingestion where possible.  If desired to prevent tooth decay, use fluoride directly on the teeth, such as toothpaste or gel.

WHAT CAN YOU DO TODAY?

If you have a child in the house, calculate their daily fluoride intake by multiplying the number of liters of fluoridated liquid (from all sources) they consume by 0.7 (ppm). Now compare this to the “industry standard” by multiplying their weight in kilograms by 0.04. Does your child consume more or less than the industry standard?

Sincerely,

Dr. James Winter, Ph.D.

Fluoride Free Canada

Newsletter Director

Send us a question or offer your assistance

Newsletter Archives

Si vous préférez recevoir des communications de Canada sans fluorure en français,
prière de compléter ce formulaire

PO Box 40100 PO Charlotte
Peterborough ON K9J8R9

Share on social

Share on FacebookShare on X (Twitter)

Go to Fluoride Free Canada  
This email was created with Wix.‌ Discover More