The reason for the despondency was that a few weeks earlier in the Seanad, Malcolm Noonan, standing in for Minister Eamon Ryan, Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications, in answer to a question regarding progress on the Narrow Water Bridge, said the following: “The overall assessment of the case for the Narrow Water Bridge, including in the context of the development of a wider tourism initiative for the region, is not at a stage where it is a clearly defined and a costed scheme.”
Such a statement on 24th May some fifteen months on from the New Decade New Approach Agreement, which revived the Stormont Assembly in January 2020 and in which the bridge was cited as an important infrastructural project to be delivered, was as mystifying as it was disheartening. It was especially so in the light of the litany of positive utterances in recent months from Taoiseach Martin and the NI Minister for Infrastructure, Nichola Mallon.
Perhaps we really shouldn't have been so surprised, as almost every public comment on the Narrow Water Bridge in the past five or six years from consecutive coalition governments in Dublin referred to the need to review 'options for a crossing at Narrow Water'. This terminology even found its way into the Dublin government's contribution to the New Decade New Approach document.
More worryingly still, it could clearly be inferred from Deputy Noonan's comments that 'options' included not having a crossing at all!
We had become the old men in the Greek proverb planting trees in whose shade they would never sit. However, in our case we were not even convinced that what we were trying to plant would ever take root.
The very next morning, as the best stories go, the Taoiseach announced that he was committing €3m in funding from the Shared Island Fund to progress work on the Narrow Water Bridge to the tender stage, with building work beginning in 2023. Politics like the Divine moves in mysterious ways!