Political contortions and public opinion
The US climate alarmists’ legal assault on their opponents continues with demands for endless paperwork to support infinitely resourced government litigatory expeditions designed to cower the Democrat’s’ opponents. Exxon Mobil, CEI and virtually all conservative US organisations as well as scientists Richard Lindzen, John Christie and David Legates are included in the subpoena calling for all “research, advocacy, strategy, reports, studies, reviews, or public opinions regarding Climate Change.”
Concerned about the impact on liberty, the Wall Street Journal advocates fighting back with counter lawsuits. The US, sickened by green cant, those considering themselves “environmentalists” have fallen from 78 per cent to 42 per cent over the past 25 years.
In the IPSOS poll Australians’ concern about tackling "global warming" fell from 55 per cent to 35 per cent over the eight years since 2008. Although an Essential poll put at 63 per cent those who think climate change is happening and it’s due to human activity.
The Australian Labor Party is betting against a growing scepticism. Their climate policy for the July election says global warming is undeniable and contains a new factoid to prove it: a claim that 0.1 per cent of the globe used to be affected by extreme weather events and the share is now10%!
Labor is planning to place a carbon charge on fossil fuel power stations and to bring in 50 per cent renewable requirements. To ease concerns it has got tame pundits to say this will have a trivial cost! Its policy includes more funding and:
- Prevention of land clearing
- Continuing and adding funding to the Climate Change Authority
- Offering $90m to help local communities shift to cleaner power generation
- Accept the target of “zero net pollution” by 2050. The Coalition has committed to it by the end of the century.
- Stick with the target of reducing emissions by 45% by 2030 based on 2005 levels – as recommended by the Climate Change Authority, compared with the Coalition’s pledge of a reduction between 26% and 28%. (When Labor first committed to the 45% emissions reduction several Coalition frontbenchers, including the environment minister, Greg Hunt, said Labor’s plan would cost the economy $600b).
Taking a leaf from the Venezuelan playbook, Labor says its massive interventions will double Australia’s energy productivity by 2030, trumping the Coalition’s limp-wristed promise to increase it by 40%! Motivated by an allure of sharing in subsidies at the expense of the more carbon intensive brown coal generators, the energy industry association is supporting the policy hoping that they will not be its next victims.
The Commonwealth May 3 budget didn’t build upon the existing projected $5 billion a year in funding and regulatory diversions in support of emission reductions. And, with Labor acquiescence, it abandoned one sleazy program, Australian Renewable Energy Agency, that provides an additional subsidy to renewables.
The Government remains intent on downsizing the CSIRO climate change propaganda unit. Attorney General Senator Brandis who in 2014, claimed to believe in anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming, in the Senate (19 April) he said that, “if the science was settled - like Labor claims - why would Australia need climate researchers?”